Tissemænd bliver større og større i gennem årene.
Die Endlösing
Problemet med de springende nyheder burde nu være løst da jeg ved en tilfældighed fandt ud af hvordan man laver scrollbars: overflow-y:scroll. Derefter er scrolbars'ene blevet malet lysegrønne. Håber at nyhedsproblemet er løst så folk kan knalde flere ind som de lyster uder at skulle flytte noinclude. --Frode Fenis 22. aug 2008, 22:05 (UTC)
- Desværre er Firefox ikke meget for scrollbar-styling (Hva' fa'n venter i på vildfarne exorbitanter. Ind på onkel Bills hjemmeside og hent en ordentlig browser)--Frode Fenis 23. aug 2008, 05:07 (UTC)
- Jeg skal nok vende tilbage til problemet med den blå boks. Problemet er jo i al sin enkelhed at det der i én skærmstørrelse fylder 7 linier, fylder 5 i en anden. Kan ordnes med nogle div'er med fast bredde inde i boksen så antallet af linier fastholdes.--Frode Fenis 23. aug 2008, 05:17 (UTC)
- Teksten i "Ting du bør vide" er sat ind i en div med fast bredde og centreret. På den måde er antallet af linier den samme og har derfor altid samme højde.--Frode Fenis 23. aug 2008, 06:02 (UTC)
- Fik lige at vide at "Endlösung" er hunkøn og det hedder derfor die Endlösung. Det er det jeg altid har sagt:Tysk er mindst to års spildtid.--Frode Fenis 24. aug 2008, 05:51 (UTC)
Monaco skin
Hi,
I’m a user of Nonciclopedia, the Italian version of Uncy. I’d like to know if you already heard about the new skin Wikia’s going to set - I mean the Monaco one - and if yes, what do you think about it. We don’t accept this change, as far as Nonciclopedia (as well as other foreign Uncyclopedias) is a Wikipedia parody, so it should achieve as much resemblance to the original as possible, but with Monaco skin it’s not practicable. So we require your support for having set again Monobook skin from Wiki: the most of registered users won’t go on with cooperating on these terms and Nonciclopedia may be over. Then, your help might avoid you to be subjected to the same treatment. Please answer here: http://nonciclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Nonciclopedia:Embassy
We thank you,
Nonciclopedia’s community
I can only speak for myself in this matter but I think that we also are very much dependent on the similarity between "wikipedia" and Monobook. Therefore it would be convenient for wikia to claim that Monaco has a better functionality, but it doesn't justify them to remove the Monobook-skin. A better solution would be to implement another no-nonsense-skin. But I can see that Wikipedia has introduced a new styling, and I don't know whether it's possible to copy the css-file. BUT:If it should come to an innegotiable demand from wikia, I personally value the quality of our articles, and I don't know if I could gain access to the informations from the database in order to migrate them to a new one. We have so far been very satisfied with wikia as host.
admin of Spademanns
Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.